Europeana / original archive photographer・institution information 

COMME des GARÇONS: The House That Made Imperfection the Point

You know the name. You've probably seen the heart logo.

But Comme des Garçons is a lot more than that.

For over five decades, Rei Kawakubo has questioned some of fashion's most basic assumptions — what makes a garment beautiful, how clothes are supposed to fit a body, what a garment even is.

So why does a Tokyo label started in 1969 still shape how designers think today?

Here's where it started, why one 1997 show still gets taught in design schools, and — the part that actually helps when you're shopping — what the tag is trying to tell you.

---

01 — THE ORIGIN

The Metropolitan Museum of Art — Comme des Garçons, Ensemble, Fall/Winter 1982–83. Designer: Rei Kawakubo. 

When "unfinished" became the whole idea.

Rei Kawakubo didn't train as a designer.

She studied fine arts in Tokyo. Then worked as a stylist — arranging other people's clothes before she ever made her own.

She started making clothes under the name Comme des Garçons in 1969. The company came together in 1973. A shop opened in Tokyo in 1976.

Then, in April 1981, she showed in Paris for the first time.

Paris at the time ran on color, fit, and polish.

Kawakubo showed almost nothing but black.

Shapes that ignored the waist.

Sweaters that looked torn. Unraveled. Moth-eaten.

Some critics called it bleak. A few reached for war imagery — which said more about their own discomfort than about the clothes.

What Kawakubo was actually doing was simpler than shock value. She was asking one question:

Does a garment have to flatter the body underneath it?

That question is still the center of Comme des Garçons, five decades and dozens of sub-labels later.

You can see the answer in the construction itself. Hems left raw on purpose. Seams sewn on the outside. Sleeves set at angles that don't match either arm.

Unfinished — but only ever on purpose.

---

02 — THE COLLECTION

The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) — Rei Kawakubo, Comme des Garçons, Body Meets Dress–Dress Meets Body Ensemble, Spring/Summer 1997. Collection of Indianapolis Museum of Art. 

What if clothes didn't follow the body at all?

The clearest answer came in 1997.

The collection was called Body Meets Dress, Dress Meets Body. Everyone just calls it "lumps and bumps."

Gingham fabric. Goose-down pads sewn into the shoulders, the back, the hips, the stomach. Silhouettes that had nothing to do with the body's actual shape.

Some of the press compared the padding to tumors. Others recognized it as one of the most serious challenges fashion had ever staged to the idea of a "perfect" runway body.

Almost thirty years later, designers still point back to it.

But 1997 wasn't a one-off. It's part of a much longer pattern — one that runs through how the whole house works.

Comme des Garçons doesn't run its sub-labels the usual way. Most brands treat a diffusion line as a cheaper, simplified version of the mainline. Kawakubo hands over real creative control instead.

Junya Watanabe is the clearest case. He joined as a patternmaker in the mid-1980s. Ran the knitwear line by 1987. Got his own line, under the Comme des Garçons name, in 1992 — with real freedom, not a watered-down brief.

Then there's Dover Street Market. Opened in London in 2004. Rebuilt every season. Treated less like a shop, more like an installation. Other "concept stores" have been copying the format ever since.

And there's the heart. Drawn by illustrator Filip Pagowski in 2002 for the PLAY line. It's the reason an avant-garde Japanese label ended up on t-shirts and Converse sneakers, worn by people who've never set foot at fashion week.

Which is part of why early Comme des Garçons still moves on the resale market — not just for the name, but because the pieces are historically specific enough to date, verify, and collect.

---

 

03 — READING THE LABEL

TrussArchive — “How To Identify COMME des GARÇONS” 

What the tag is trying to tell you.

Comme des Garçons isn't one label. It's a family of them.

Mainline — the most experimental. Collectors call it "Comme Comme."

Homme Plus — that same sensibility, built for menswear.

Junya Watanabe — technical, research-driven, its own thing entirely.

PLAY — the red heart. T-shirts, cardigans, Converse. The most casual line by far.

Each one means something different. Knowing which is which changes what you should expect from the piece in your hands.

Original tags carry a code. The first letter usually tells you the line:

Made before 2001? The tag shows "AD" plus a year — AD1991, for example. You'd need to cross-reference runway archives to pin down the actual season.

Made after 2001? The coding gets more specific — extra characters for item type and season.

None of this is printed on the outside. You have to check the inside tag. That's the difference between browsing and actually knowing what you're looking at.

One more thing worth knowing: Comme des Garçons — PLAY especially — gets counterfeited a lot. Treat the tag as a starting point, not proof. Stitching, typography, fabric weight — those tell you more than a single code ever will.

What to look for: check the first letter on the tag before you assume you know what's in your hands. A worn PLAY tee and an early Homme Plus jacket can hang on the same rack looking equally "Comme." They're not the same decade. Not the same intention. Not the same reason to buy.

[IMAGE SUGGESTION: mainline runway image or archive editorial shot, placed after the intro]

[IMAGE SUGGESTION: 1997 "Body Meets Dress" collection image, placed in 02 — THE COLLECTION]

[IMAGE SUGGESTION: close-up of an inside tag showing the line code, placed next to the tag table in 03 — READING THE LABEL]

---

EXPLORE COMME des GARÇONS ON ROAMWALK →

Now that you know what separates a mainline piece from Homme Plus, or an early Tricot knit from a PLAY tee, ROAMWALK's Comme des Garçons archive is a good place to put that knowledge to use.

https://roamwalk.net/collections/comme-des-garcons —  confirmed live.